AI Readiness Audit
From €500
Find the business processes worth automating first.
Know what the first build would cover before you commit to it.
A process map, priorities and a clear starting scope.
Connect your existing tools, automate repetitive operations and deploy practical AI agents. Start with an AI Readiness Audit or a focused Automation Sprint.
01 / SERVICES
From €500
Find the business processes worth automating first.
Know what the first build would cover before you commit to it.
A process map, priorities and a clear starting scope.
From €2,000
Automate one high-value workflow or a small connected group.
One workflow that runs without anyone re-typing it. Usually two to six weeks of build, about two hours of your team’s time.
A focused build, tested with the people who use it.
From €5,000
Connect systems, workflows and agents into an operational layer.
Enquiries, support and operations share one record, and every decision that needs a person reaches one.
Sales, support and operations with clear human controls.
From €300/month
Monitor, maintain and improve deployed automations and agents.
Choose ongoing monitoring and maintenance after the included 30-day support window.
Ongoing support with responsibilities agreed in writing.
Indicative starting prices. We agree scope, integrations and final pricing in writing before work begins.
Still unsure? That’s what the free 30-minute assessment is for.
Schedule changes live in chat. Photo-confirmations of turnovers live in chat. Issue reports live in chat. When you onboarded a second property, the chat became unusable; nothing replaced it.
The off-the-shelf platforms you've evaluated either do too much (and cost what an enterprise pays) or do too little (and need three of them to cover one workflow). What you actually need is the missing wiring, not a new platform.
Onboarding a new property used to take a day; now it takes a week because the steps aren't written down. The number of "small fixes" you do in any given week has stopped getting smaller.
When they are away, requests wait; when they are back, the backlog is already bigger.
PMS connectors, channel-manager APIs, and the custom integrations that nobody ships off the shelf. Bidirectional integrations with Cloudbeds (in active development, not yet generally available) — read availability, write back reservations, push and receive guest messages. Beyond the major PMS systems: direct API work with channel managers, OTA endpoints, booking engines, digital locks, payment providers, ID verification, and accounting systems. The connection you need that doesn't already exist, built once and owned by you.
Multi-step workflows that run on their own. Guest-message routing, supplier reorder rules, cleaning schedule generation, dynamic pricing triggers, late-checkout fee handling, supplier ordering. The category covers anything that maps to "this should happen automatically when X" and removes the recurring decisions that don't need a human in the loop.
One example. The pipeline changes per client — the pattern doesn't.
Internal dashboards reading your existing data sources directly without a replatform. Owner-facing monthly reports generated from your real data, formatted the way your owners actually want them, sent automatically. Both surfaces solve the same underlying problem: people who need to see numbers are squinting at exports today. Less spreadsheet work for you; more confidence for them; the data is the same — it's just finally readable.
Where the work is repetitive and verification is cheap. Document workflows, guest-message summarisation, anomaly detection on bookings, and similar tasks where a language model saves real time without introducing real risk. The pattern is: the model drafts, you sign off; the model flags, you decide.
You describe the symptom; we ask the questions that turn a symptom into a scope. By the end of the call you know whether this is one week of work or one quarter.
Scope, deliverables, timeline, fixed price or T&M rate. Short, specific, reviewable. Nothing is verbal.
Concrete time commitment from your side is roughly two hours across the engagement — kick-off, mid-build review, handover. We work in your repositories where one exists.
Handover includes a written runbook, a video walkthrough and 30 days of included support for defects in the delivered scope. After that, Managed AI is optional; without it, fixes are billed hourly.
A booking, a payment or a request is recorded in one place and reaches every system that needs it. Nobody re-types it from one screen into another.
Routine steps run on their own. Anything unusual is flagged to whoever needs to decide, instead of waiting in a chat until someone notices.
Every project ends with a written runbook and a video walkthrough, so your team can keep it running when someone is away.
We connect the systems you already use. You are not moved onto a new platform because it happens to be what we sell.
A written scope with a fixed price or an agreed time-and-materials rate. You know what you're paying for before anything is built.
Most engagements ship in two to six weeks of build time. A simple integration (e.g. Cloudbeds → Stripe reconciliation) lands in two; a full internal dashboard with PMS + payment + reporting reads is four to six. We tell you which bucket you're in at the end of the discovery call, before any commitment.
The handover includes a written runbook and a video walkthrough, so common breaks are diagnosable by someone on your team. For the first 30 days after handover, we fix defects in the delivered scope at no extra cost. After that, you choose: Managed AI for ongoing monitoring and maintenance, or hourly fixes when you need them. We don't disappear after delivery; we also don't auto-charge you for a retainer you didn't ask for.
The honest answer: it's not different in the build phase — a competent freelancer can write the same code we'd write. It's different in scope (we say no to work that isn't a good fit, freelancers often can't afford to), in documentation (a written scope and a runbook on every project, not just an invoice), and in continuity (we'll still be here next quarter when you need a small change). If you have a freelancer who's already delivered for you twice and is available, hire them. If you don't, this is the alternative.
Yes. We work into existing repositories and codebases, take handover from previous contributors, and don't pitch the relationship-replacement conversation. The discovery call confirms the scope you actually want done; if your existing team is the right home for the work, we say so.
Yes — provided the existing work is documented enough to understand and the previous contributor isn't actively in the codebase. Inheriting a half-built system is sometimes a discount (we don't start from scratch) and sometimes a premium (we have to read someone else's code before we can write our own). We tell you which at the end of the discovery call.
Your brief has been received. We’ll review it and follow up about the next step.